| SAM THOMAS | |
| JOSHUA POWELL | Protect all that is good and green! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | This development will over-stretch the transport infrastructure in the area, further eroding the recreqtion experiance and the rural/open landscape. Where will these people work? |
| NAME SUPPLIED | No more houses to be built in Warfield |
| STUART BRIDGES | too many houses no infrastructure no jobs no recreation creates bracknell as no go area - more crime, vandalism, drugs pollution, gridlock. Well done Labour another great plan!!!! |
| STUART BRIDGES | Too many houses already, no infrastructure, no jobs, no space for recreatuin , no recreation. wha are theses people so |
| ANDRE LUCKER | Enough building in Warfield please! Green belt disapearing rapidly!! |
| MR & MRS R POOLE | more houses, more people, more cars is unthinkable!!! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Enough is enough! |
| CHARLES MCLEOD | Warfield is already highly built upon and borders the green belt. Mass overbuilding is ruining this country which is already too highly populated |
| DIANE BRIDGES | Too many houses, not enough space, not enough schools, shops community MORE CRIME, MORE POLLUTION, MORE VANDALISM STOP THIS MADNESS |
| NAME SUPPLIED | I want my planet to be around for my Grandchildren |
| WYN MORGAN | We must stop this development!! Keep our countryside! |
| EMMA FOX | Planners have a duty and obligation to preserve the rural communities of Warfield with their history natural beauty. Focus on REdeveloping the eye sore that is Bracknell and leave Warfield alone! |
| MIKE HUNT | anyone seen me |
| NAME SUPPLIED | We do not need more houses, we need a smaller manageable population which allows room for the inherent beauty of unspoiled nature. |
| BRIGID BATT-RAWDEN | More houses, more cars, more danger on roads for my horse and I !!! |
| DARRYL PITT | we have had more than enough development in Warfield already, please no more. |
| PENNY JONES | I have liv |
| NAME SUPPLIED | keep Warfield green!!! |
| SABINA POLLARD | The greenery is what keeps us sane,I want Warfield to stay green! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Bracknell hasn't got the infrastructure to maintain its current population do not build more houses. keep the countryside green |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| CARLOS GUSTAVO LOZANO CASTILLO | |
| JENNIE BOATMAN | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | This proposed development makes so little sense it must surely be rejected. |
| BOB INMAN | This isn't about green belt/wildlife/supporting resource - it's about profit making and housing the ever exploding population being allowed by the government. Sadly any protest will have no effect |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Paid premium to live in such a beautiful area. Breaking my heart to think it could change and with it bring social problems, more traffic, etc.. Already take my life in my hands crossing Harvest Ride. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Enough is enough ! |
| NICK GRANDVOINET | Lived in West End Lane for 7 years (94-01) & would hate to see it change. |
| RIEKERT GILIOMEE | What elements will the council allow to live there ??? |
| JENNIE GREEN | Warfiled doesn't need more houses especially on the beautiful open space at Lark's Hill which is well used all day everyday no matter what the weather |
| MARCO | keep it green! |
| PETER OSBORNE | Essential to keep separation of communities and not allow Bracknell to consume all surrounding communites |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Leave Larkshill alone! |
| RICHARD CAMPBELL | Where are the plans for new schools, hospitals, play areas, community centres, dentists and doctors surgeries to support this plan? This is unsustainable development. |
| STEWART BROOKS | With so many Brown Field sites in Bracknell why build on our natural beauty! Whoever has decided this must have another agenda or being paid for trying to get this through! |
| CHRIS MUSTOE | We DONT need any more houses in Bracknell especially in Warfield. Lets preserve the our natural heritage while we can. NO MORE HOUSES IN WARFIELD!!! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | The Council will formalise their building plans soon. If we don't oppose them Warfield will be covered under houses. No more countryside, Suburbanised Warfield - YOUR CHOICE!! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | The green land surrounding Warfield is a great facility for residents to enjoy the countryside. Our government always tell us that our green belt is prtected because brown field sites are being used |
| NAME SUPPLIED | We are just moving in to the area and feel this would be a retrograde step. We liked it for its rural appearance. |
| GUY HANCOX | |
| JONATHAN HARMAN | This would completely ruin the rural village of Warfield which would dissappear for ever |
| NAME SUPPLIED | There is no way Warfield's facilities can support that amount of new houses. No to the development! |
| MARK COLLINGS | The existing infrastructure does not fully support the existing number of residents, how can it support more? |
| SHEILA COLLINGS | Keep Warfield green - residents work hard to maintain these areas and increase wildlife, don't build on them. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | This area can't cope with new houses. Lack of facilites; road access; schools and general lack of water supply will all help make this area an unpleasent place to live. This local council is rubbish. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | This cannot be allowed to happen. The infrastructure simply cannot cope. Warfield should be left alone for all to enjoy not avoid!! |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Please protect the wonderful wildlife we have in Warfield, no more Houses! |
| STEVEN PINKERTON | Bracknell road systems are not developed enough to cope with anymore traffic in the Warfeild area. Lets keep what green belt we have left |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | There has been enough expansion of Warfield. We do not want more houses, more cars and more congestion. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | More congestion, more pollution, more cases of sathma and Braething problems. Insufficient water now. Insufficient school places. Encourage businesses to relocate to NE / NW instead (suffic H2O there) |
| DENISE DEBORAH GRIFFITHS | I do not want to see anymore open space disappear. |
| CAIREEN HARRISON | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | There is little evidence of infrastructure improvement in the Warfield plan. Already an accute lack of quality schooling and busy local roads. What happened to the promise of sustainable development? |
| HOLLY HIGGINS | Where will we all walk and play if they fill our lovely countryside with houses. Please don't do it ! |
| STEPHEN HIGGINS | Everyone need places like Warfield, both now and for the future |
| DEBBIE HIGGINS | Please do not ruin this beautiful part of Berkshire with houses that we really do not need and definitely do not want ! |
| ALAN JONES | Simply, the infrastructure cannot cope now. The Nthn Relief road for Bracknell has been routed through Warfield, there is no decent secondary school for miles and amenities for youngsters are lacking |
| NAME SUPPLIED | This should be fought by whatever means possible, for when the open countryside is gone, it is gone forever. |
| JOHN WELLS | THis plan is totally lacking in a coherrrant policy for the infrastructure of the local area. There is a lck of thought for the area aroung Warfield and the overall benefits the community currently ha |
| NAME SUPPLIED | The houses will be built on the "green lung" between Warfield and Bracknell. This will totally destroy Warfield's identity. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Don't destroy what little countryside we have left around us. The local infrastructure cannot cope with more houses. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | I do not see how the infrastructure is going to cope (road to Windor & Maidenhead). |
| ROBERT SOUTAR | there are enough houses in the area and will detract from the countryside |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Erosion of our countryside must stop. Warfield has already been over-developed to the point of infrastructure unable to cope with the number of homes and people. Further development must be stopped. |
| MARY ROWLINSON | Concerned about overcrowding & inadequate infrastructure |
| SASHA PETERSON | |
| MARCIA PETERSON | |
| THERESA PETERSON | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| TRACEY PARNWELL | We need to preserve the green spaces as they are valuable wildlife habitats! |
| JULIAN EDWARD COUSINS | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| STEVE DIAPER | Not only is the rural feel of Warfield key to its appeal and to providing amenities to Bracknell area, but the infrastructure (roads, medical, education, etc) simply cannot cope with such an increase |
| NAME SUPPLIED | We do not have the infrastructure to cope with this large development. We'd like to keep our countryside. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Simple logic. The MOD owns lots of land in Berkshire. Move the MOD to where there isn't a housing shortage and build on the MOD land before ruining communities! Keep Warfield healthy |
| JAMES BRADBURY | Look around the country, over development leads to house values dropping, communities suffer, yobbish culture, ASBO etc. This should not happen to Warfield. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Please keep Warfield green! |
| GAYLE WILLIAMS | Warfield is beautifull. It makes me very sad to think that it cold be lost forever in sprawling urbanisation. Please don't let it happen. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NICOLA MACDONALD | The countryside is disappearing and the beauty of this green area will be lost for ever. There are far better areas in the South East to build on rather than an area of natural beauty. |
| JAMIE MACDONALD | New Developments should be sited on existing derelict or run down areas of Bracknell rather than developing the countyrside. Old industrial and empty office buildings are prime locations 4 new builds |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Isn't Warfield and the surrounding area a big enough housing estate as it is? |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| GUY COURT | Current infrastructure is overloaded, not enough local schools, we need green space to help remain healthy and encourage the little wildlife we have. |
| ROBERT I ENTWISTLE | Quality of life, environment and services will suffer. |
| DOMINIQUE ENTWISTLE | Keep it green . No more houses |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Insufficient services in the area and roads where speeding is the norm - we don't need any other houses in the area. |
| NAME SUPPLIED | The area being suggested contains nature that should be preserved and protected. Alternative 'brown field' areas should be considered for development of housing in the area. |
| RICHARD BOWLES | this is clearly an an attempt by bfc to gain more income from council tax and no thought about the enviroment or local peoples feelings |
| DAVID WARE | |
| CLAIRE & RICHARD WALLEN | Stop Warfield becoming a Bracknell 'urban extension'. Concerns over stress on environment, infrastructure esp water provision, traffic, loss of community |
| NAME SUPPLIED | |
| NAME SUPPLIED | Loss of only remaining green land + Infrastructure issues |
| JEFFREY T ALLEN | The Southeast of England is already overcrowded, the central government should move new housing northwards where they do not have water shortages, as overcrowded roads and as little countryside |
